The Day Beautiful Meant Something Different

The Day Beautiful Meant Something Different

Before I had my son, I thought I understood what beauty meant. It felt like a category to me, something you could quietly assess, the way you might look at a painting or a piece of music or a human face and feel like some things just had more of it and some things had less, and at the time that seemed obvious and honest to me, so I never really stopped to question it.

Then I had Austin, and that entire idea shifted into a whole new dimension, not because I stopped seeing but because I started seeing something I hadn’t realized was there before.

When I look at him, the experience has nothing to do with what he looks like (although he is objectively adorable, in my humble opinion), and it isn’t an assessment at all. It feels more like recognition, like encountering a being whose existence somehow isn’t up for evaluation in the first place, a being who is simply here and whole and entirely, overwhelmingly perfect, and the only word my mind can reach for that even begins to hold the feeling is beautiful.

Something about bringing a life into the world opened something up in me that I can’t quite close again, and suddenly I began noticing it everywhere, in every child, in people walking down the street, in animals, in trees, and in the simple fact that anything at all is alive. It felt like I could see the same light, the same spark of God, running quietly through every living thing.

It’s one thing to believe that life is sacred, because people say that all the time and it can sound like a comforting idea, but it’s a completely different thing to feel that truth arrive through your own body, to hold a life that didn’t exist before and realize that something truly magical has appeared in the world.

And that’s when I started realizing something simple but kind of amazing, which is that every parent looks at their child and sees the most beautiful child in the world, and the crazy thing is they’re all right.

Not as a figure of speech, but literally, because what they’re describing isn’t an evaluation at all. It’s the experience of encountering a being whose existence simply feels completely right, completely itself, and the remarkable thing is that every child actually is that, every single one of them.

I didn’t have a word for it yet. I just knew that what I was feeling was real, and that it was bigger than anything I had been taught to call beautiful.

There’s an ancient Greek word, kalos, that we usually translate as beautiful, but it didn’t mean pretty the way we tend to use the word now, because the Greeks hadn’t really separated beauty from goodness and rightness yet. For them those ideas were all part of the same thing, simply approached from different angles, and something was kalos when it was completely itself, when its existence simply fit, when it belonged exactly where it was.

And when I started reading about it later, what struck me was that people across centuries kept circling the same feeling, each in their own language, trying to observe it and give it a name. The Greeks described it as the rightness of being, Christian thinkers spoke about it as divine order, and modern psychology tends to use words like coherence or vitality or wholeness, but all of them, in their own way, were trying to put words to the same thing.

Now when I tell someone you have a beautiful child, I’m not saying it to be polite or kind in the way I once thought I was. I’m saying it because I really see it. Because I see the beauty and the life and something sacred inside that perfect little being.

Before I had my son I might have just been being kind. Now I’m being honest.

Back to blog